Comparison
Kadenza compared with a scheduling tool
Where a scheduling tool wins
Queueing is solved. A good scheduler lets you line up a month, hit approve and forget it, and if your only problem is that you keep forgetting to post, that fixes your problem today for very little money.
Pick that instead if You already know what to write, you write it easily, and the only thing going wrong is that it does not go out.
A scheduling tool takes posts you have already written and sends them at a time you picked. That is a real job and the good ones do it well.
The gap
It starts after the hard part. Deciding what deserves to be written is the bit that decides whether a post works, and a queue has no opinion about that. Fill it with the wrong ideas and you now publish the wrong ideas on time.
What we add around it
We work the two ends nobody else touches. What to make, drawn from what is actually working for the people ahead of you, and what happens after, so the person who commented becomes a name in a list rather than a notification you lost. Scheduling sits in the middle and we do that too.
The honest trade
If you love your scheduler, keep it. We are not trying to win an argument about queues. The reason to move is wanting the research and the follow up in the same place as the calendar rather than in three tabs and a notes app.